Gammel Elfborgs anfald ved Tordenskjold i 1719 1726 - 1757

Editor: This is “Gammel Elfborgs anfald ved Tordenskjold i 1719,” an engraving and etching from between 1726 and 1757, currently residing at the SMK. It looks like a map depicting a naval battle, almost like a bird's eye view. What's striking is the cherubic figure in the corner seemingly overseeing the destruction. How do we interpret a battle through such a visually controlled image? Curator: Well, firstly, consider the context. These weren’t just maps, but political tools. The idealized depiction, almost a glorification of Tordenskjold's victory, speaks volumes. Notice the cartouche – the decorative element surrounding the title. It uses classical motifs to lend gravitas and legitimize the event and power. This battle would likely be framed in a context of political and cultural propaganda. How do you think the audience would have received this? Editor: It feels…sanitized. Distant. Not really focusing on the gritty reality of war, but reinforcing power structures and celebrating victory through symbolism. It seems more about making a statement. Curator: Exactly! These images played a crucial role in shaping public perception of military power and national identity. What purpose do you think it serves to portray something inherently chaotic and violent like naval battle into a neat and structured map? Editor: I think it would to inspire confidence and maybe intimidate rivals by showcasing military prowess as something that can be controlled and understood in such a measurable, cartographic form. I learned today about how art of this era had direct social impact, and that it wasn’t necessarily just "art for art's sake”. Curator: Precisely. Thinking about the intention changes everything, doesn't it? The act of seeing power solidified visually.