Notater vedrørende Skipper Klementes opstand og slaget ved Svendstrup mose. Afskrift efter Vendsyssel Aarbøger 1925 by Niels Larsen Stevns

Notater vedrørende Skipper Klementes opstand og slaget ved Svendstrup mose. Afskrift efter Vendsyssel Aarbøger 1925 1933 - 1934

0:00
0:00

drawing, paper, ink

# 

drawing

# 

paper

# 

ink

# 

calligraphy

Dimensions 175 mm (height) x 109 mm (width) (monteringsmaal), 175 mm (height) x 109 mm (width) (bladmaal)

Curator: Editor: Niels Larsen Stevns' 1933 to 1934 ink drawing on paper, "Notater vedrørende Skipper Klementes opstand og slaget ved Svendstrup mose. Afskrift efter Vendsyssel Aarbøger 1925" is, well, literally a page out of history. It looks like handwriting—historical notes, perhaps? What can you tell me about it? Curator: Yes, exactly! I think Stevns created something intriguing by hand-copying text related to the Peasant Revolt led by Skipper Clement. You're not just looking at a drawing, but at an act of transcription that's part history, part performance. The act of handwriting, the meticulousness – doesn't it hint at something reverential, or perhaps… a little obsessive? Editor: Obsessive! Yes, I can see that. The handwriting *is* very uniform. Was calligraphy a common practice at the time? Curator: Good question! Calligraphy as an art form had experienced a revival, connecting to ideas of craft and national identity, especially relevant in the interwar period. How does that context affect how you view this historical reflection? Editor: Knowing that context… It's not just notes; it's almost like a historical reenactment through script! A physical engagement with history. But why handwriting rather than just reprinting the text? Curator: Precisely! Perhaps the act of handwriting offered a deeper, more intimate connection to the past for Stevns. Consider the difference between passively reading text versus painstakingly recreating it by hand. Doesn't the latter involve a level of empathetic understanding? Almost inhabiting the past? Editor: So, more than just a document, it's an artistic interpretation *of* a document? Curator: Indeed. It blurs the lines between historical record and personal expression. That’s Stevns’ magic. It’s got me pondering, what ways might our future chroniclers record this current moment? Editor: That’s an amazing way to consider it! I initially thought it was *just* text, but now I realize Stevns is exploring history on a very personal level. Curator: I agree. We both just travelled through time a bit!

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.