Dimensions: image: 600 x 892 mm
Copyright: © Richard Deacon | CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED, Photo: Tate
Editor: This untitled work by Richard Deacon presents a striking contrast between a dense swarm of bees and what looks like rubble. It's strangely unsettling, almost apocalyptic. What's your interpretation? Curator: It resonates with anxieties about environmental collapse and the exploitation of nature. Bees, vital for pollination, become a symbol of precarity. The rubble suggests destruction, prompting us to consider the consequences of unchecked industrial growth and our relationship to the natural world. Do you see a connection to contemporary social issues? Editor: I hadn't thought of it that way, but definitely. It makes you think about who bears the brunt of environmental damage. Curator: Exactly. Deacon's work isn't just about aesthetics; it's a call to action, a demand for ecological justice. Editor: Wow, I see it now. It's powerful how art can reveal these hidden layers of meaning. Curator: Indeed, by engaging with art critically, we can gain a deeper understanding of the complex social forces that shape our world.
Comments
Join the conversation
Join millions of artists and users on Artera today and experience the ultimate creative platform.
This portfolio contains twelve black-and-white screenprints, none of which has an individual title. Each print brings together a photograph, selected from Deacon's own extensive photographic archive, and a smaller ink drawing. Deacon's personal archive contains both clippings of found images and his own photographs. He loosely categorises them under a number of headings in order to identify and delineate certain unintended repetitions in his choice of subject matter. By choosing one of his own images from most of these groupings, Deacon arrived at this selection of twelve photographs. The earliest photograph dates from 1988, the most recent from 1996. The photographs are grainy, atmospheric images of either natural forms, such as trees and rock formations, or of the interaction between the natural and manmade environment, such as an industrial pipe encased in a thick layer of ice, or a wooden statue worn by the elements. The ink drawings were produced, independently of the photographs, during an intense period of work in the Summer of 1996. They have been superimposed over the photographs as a kind of 'stamp' in either the lower left- or right-hand corner. Deacon has then produced a silkscreen print of the combined elements in order to create an image in which both the photograph and drawing form part of the same continuous surface. The drawings are simple and diagrammatic in nature, highly suggestive of organic form. Deacon has commented in unpublished writings that 'the process of matching drawing to photograph was intuitive but in each case there is a reciprocal relation of some sort between the two'. For the viewer, the connections between photograph and drawing remain largely ambiguous. However, in many of the images one can identify visual counterpoints that link the two. For example, the wooden statue of a saint carrying a lamb and the bible is juxtaposed with a drawing of interlocking biomorphic forms. The wavy contours of Deacon's line drawing echo those of the lamb's curly fleece and establishes a visual connection between the two. According to Charles Booth-Clibborn, the publisher of this portfolio, these images literally 'show and tell' how Deacon has used photographs of natural forms as sources for his sculptures. Many of the drawings certainly recall the open linear structures of his work in laminated wood, such as For Those Who Have Ears #2, 1983 (Tate T03958). Some, like the drawing that accompanies the wooden statue, evoke more 'solid' sculptures such as Struck Dumb, 1988 (Tate T05558). The series was printed at Coriander Press in London, and was published by Charles Booth-Clibborn under his imprint The Paragon Press. It exists in an edition of thirty-five, of which Tate's set in number thirty-three. Further reading:Jon Thompson, Pier Luigi Tazzi and Peter Schjeldahl, Richard Deacon, London 1995.Patrick Elliott (ed.), Contemporary Art in Print, London 2001, pp.36-45, reproduced pp.37-45.Jeremy Lewison, 'Contemporary British Art in Print?' in Patrick Elliott (ed.), Contemporary Art in Print, London 2001, p.18. Helen DelaneyNovember 2001