Typografische ereboog bij de verjaardag van prinses Wilhelmina van Pruisen op 7 augustus 1788 by Willem Coertse

Typografische ereboog bij de verjaardag van prinses Wilhelmina van Pruisen op 7 augustus 1788 1788

0:00
0:00

graphic-art, print, typography, poster, engraving

# 

portrait

# 

graphic-art

# 

neoclacissism

# 

print

# 

typography

# 

poster

# 

engraving

Dimensions: height 545 mm, width 450 mm

Copyright: Rijks Museum: Open Domain

Curator: Here we have a commemorative print, “Typografische ereboog bij de verjaardag van prinses Wilhelmina van Pruisen op 7 augustus 1788” created in 1788 by Willem Coertse. Looking at the typography, engraving and the use of paper, what comes to mind for you? Editor: Well, the first thing that strikes me is how it uses text as a visual element. It's not just information; the lettering *is* the art. I’m interested in this idea of a ‘typographical triumphal arch' as much more than simply graphic design or commercial art. How might it challenge what we consider ‘fine art’? Curator: Precisely! Consider the production of this print. Typography relies on a division of labor: the typesetter, the printer, and in this case, the engraver, all contributing. It speaks to a broader system of production and dissemination of information in 18th-century Netherlands. How does the *process* itself – the labour, the materials – shape its meaning, particularly in relation to celebrating Princess Wilhelmina? Editor: So, you’re suggesting that by looking at the *how* it was made, we can understand *why* it was made? That it's about more than just celebrating royalty? Curator: Absolutely. This wasn't some singular, divinely inspired artist toiling in isolation. It was a collaborative, commercial undertaking meant for mass consumption. Think about the accessibility of a printed poster versus, say, an oil painting at that time. Who was the audience, and what were they consuming beyond the image of the princess? Editor: I never really considered the social aspect like that. I was initially caught up in the neoclassical style and heraldry, but the materials and means of production definitely reframe the artwork in its specific time. Curator: Indeed. We’re left questioning how mass-produced images contribute to power structures and cultural values, and even shape social classes, as it was used to consolidate the state image. Editor: It changes everything! Thanks, that perspective gave me so much more to think about.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.