Studies of Major von Washington 

Editor: So, here we have Wilhelm von Kobell's "Studies of Major von Washington," a watercolor and pencil drawing. I’m struck by the sketch-like quality, especially in the two full figures. It feels like we’re catching a glimpse of the artistic process. What do you make of it? Curator: Well, as a materialist, I find the *means of production* quite telling. Notice the rough paper, the visible pencil strokes alongside the watercolor washes. This isn’t just about depicting Major von Washington; it’s about the *act of* depicting, the labor involved. Consider how the artist is literally sketching out power. Editor: That’s a great point. I was focusing on the *subject*, but you’re right, it’s also about how it was *made*. How does the fact that it’s a study change its meaning? Curator: Exactly! It becomes a commodity in itself, distinct from a ‘finished’ portrait. What materials were available to Kobell? Was this commissioned or a personal project? These factors shape the value and function of the artwork. And who was Major von Washington *really*? Just a symbol? Editor: So it’s not just about aesthetics, but about the whole socio-economic context that produced it? The physical reality of the paper and paint tells a bigger story? Curator: Precisely. It invites us to question the materials that go into making status, both in the subject depicted and the artwork itself. Who benefits from this representation and how is this access structured? It opens up some avenues. Editor: That gives me a whole new perspective. I was ready to just appreciate the artistic skill. Curator: By focusing on the process and materials, we reveal hidden layers of meaning. It shows just how potent the artistic process is. Editor: Thank you, this gave me a great approach to seeing how labor impacts a work of art! Curator: Absolutely, now you may never see another portrait the same way.