Répartition aléatoire du rouge au jaune suivant progression... 1970

Editor: So this is François Morellet's *Répartition aléatoire du rouge au jaune suivant progression...* from 1970. It's essentially an abstract grid filled with squares in different shades of red and yellow, a simple geometric pattern...yet I find it surprisingly calming. How do you interpret this work? Curator: Morellet’s work operates in a fascinating intersection between rigid systems and chance. The "random distribution" in the title points to an embrace of the aleatory, a concept explored by many artists during this period. But I think it's crucial to consider this work within the larger socio-political context of the late 60s and early 70s, don't you? Editor: I do...I mean, could you elaborate a little more on the connection with socio-political contexts? Curator: Well, you have this emphasis on the systematic and impersonal which resonates with post-structuralist thought questioning authorship and traditional hierarchies. Artists like Morellet, in their own way, were dismantling the cult of the individual, weren’t they? And challenging the power structures embedded in the art world, by utilizing seemingly simple, even democratic systems. Editor: That's a really interesting point, especially considering how art was often used to uphold the status quo. Curator: Exactly. And this isn't just about aesthetics; it’s about questioning who gets to create and define meaning, a conversation that continues to be incredibly relevant. This idea of decentralization in art mirrors broader dialogues about equality, power, and control of the narrative. Do you see any contemporary resonance of these topics? Editor: Yes definitely, looking at his work now I can see a parallel with the importance we now place on social justice, decentralization, and dismantling old-fashioned cultural norms, which can open it up for modern reinterpretations. Thanks, that’s so interesting. Curator: I agree completely. It's a testament to the enduring power of art, that the visual simplicity can hide complex social and philosophical questions.