Groningse vlieger, 1560 1560

Editor: This object is the Groningse Vlieger from 1560, crafted from metal with engraving. It’s a small, somewhat damaged coin. I’m struck by the imagery; it seems quite grand for something so small. How should we interpret this kind of object? Curator: This isn't just currency; it's a declaration. Currency functioned as propaganda, visually reinforcing the issuer’s power. The 'Groningse Vlieger' demonstrates the city's desire to assert its autonomy during a politically fraught time. Do you notice the eagle? Editor: Yes, a prominent double-headed eagle in the centre, above what looks like a shield? Curator: Exactly! The double-headed eagle, an imperial symbol, makes a bold claim. For Groningen, a city striving for greater independence from larger powers, to adopt such iconography sends a clear message about their aspirations. Editor: So, even everyday objects were invested with political significance? How did the public perceive it? Curator: Absolutely. Its impact likely shifted based on social status. Common people viewed it as money. Political elites immediately grasped the implied symbolism, and perceived aspirations of control by Groningen. Editor: I see. The visual language broadcasted power to some, while others engaged on a purely transactional level. I guess I had never really thought about coins having different social roles. Curator: It forces us to consider how even mundane objects operate within power structures, consciously or subconsciously shaping perceptions and narratives. Editor: That's fascinating. Thanks for sharing your perspective! I see this Vlieger, not just as metal now, but as an intriguing artifact of history.