Icon polyptic and leather case 18th-19th century

Editor: This object is called “Icon polyptych and leather case” from the 18th or 19th century. It’s made from paint, wood, and leather. It gives off an intimate, almost private feeling, like a treasured possession. What stands out to you? Curator: I’m immediately drawn to the construction, the materiality. Look at the polyptych: paint on wood, a common enough practice, but considered within the leather case, we see a conscious combination of art and utility. We should consider what the case does: protect, transport, conceal. Do you think that adds another layer of meaning to the artwork? Editor: I see what you mean! The leather case makes it functional, not just decorative. Was this something meant to be carried, perhaps during travel? Curator: Exactly. And we should consider who had access to this object. Leather suggests expense, skilled craftsmanship. Were these mass produced or the work of one craftsperson? And how would the perception of these figures change based on the social status of the person who owns this work of art? Editor: It does seem like a really personal, precious item. Is the contrast in materials significant, perhaps the rustic leather against the more refined, painted icons? Curator: That contrast speaks volumes. The painted icons signify artistry and devotion, while the raw, practical leather roots the piece in the everyday realities of life and labor. Does it make you question traditional notions of “art” versus “craft?” Editor: Absolutely. The combination blurs those lines. Thinking about it this way makes me appreciate how art is also a product of specific materials and making processes, shaped by social factors and artistic values. Curator: Precisely. The object then reveals cultural information, shedding light on patterns of consumption and class structure. It changes everything when we investigate material and culture!