Hendrik IV, koning van Frankrijk before 1944

Editor: This small sculpture, "Hendrik IV, koning van Frankrijk," predates 1944 and appears to be crafted from ivory or a similar material. It depicts the King in full regalia. The incredible detail achieved in such a delicate medium makes me wonder about the story of its making. What can you tell me about the material realities of its creation and its cultural position? Curator: Consider the sourcing of the ivory. It represents colonial trade routes, a violent exploitation of both animal and human resources in Africa and Asia. The "art" is born of specific means and modes of production inextricably linked to unequal power dynamics, even when it features a European royal figure. Editor: So, looking at the object itself, can you speak about its style? Curator: Its existence embodies courtly European tastes for collectibles during this period, speaking to status and connoisseurship. Now, think about who had the resources to own this, and the system that supported those means. What labor went into the king's luxurious outfit itself, recreated here? The carver has transformed the raw material, yet this obscures and perpetuates the historical situation. Does this shift how you understand it? Editor: Absolutely. The miniature scale and intricate detail now speak less of artistry and more about conspicuous consumption enabled by these systems of exploitation. Is the artistry therefore corrupted, do you think? Curator: It's less about corruption and more about understanding the complete picture. Materiality always points to these complex socio-economic relationships. Analyzing objects like this can unveil that whole hidden process. Editor: I see. Considering the source material really reframes how to approach the entire work, beyond its face value. Thanks. Curator: Indeed, thinking about the origins and labour gives greater context. I am glad we could think together about how the making impacts what it symbolizes.