Cave Gold 2017

Editor: This piece, "Cave Gold" by David Michael Hinnebusch, made in 2017, incorporates mixed media, collage, and acrylic paint. I'm struck by the tension between figuration and abstraction. The portrait is recognizable, yet the geometric forms and chaotic brushstrokes seem to undermine a clear narrative. How do you interpret this work? Curator: Considering the socio-political landscape, particularly regarding public art, Hinnebusch's use of collage and varied styles— abstract expressionism, pop-art, even hints of graffiti—creates a layered dialogue. Do you think this piece, if displayed publicly, would provoke different responses depending on the viewer's background? Editor: Absolutely. Someone familiar with graffiti art might connect to the immediacy and rebelliousness, while others may only see visual disorder. The "cave" in the title also makes me wonder about hidden meanings or layers of interpretation. Curator: Exactly. Think about the 'gold' as well. What is valued and by whom? It asks us to question institutional definitions of art, wealth and cultural significance. The portrait could be anyone. Its very anonymity forces the viewer to reflect on these concepts. It challenges the historical gatekeepers and asks who gets to define 'art'. Editor: That’s a great point about the artist's intention to broaden the audience's access to the work. Perhaps even challenge traditional power dynamics within the art world. Curator: Yes, and I think that’s successful. So, what did you gain reflecting upon this art piece? Editor: I will definitely consider how social context can play a significant role in deciphering and appreciating art that at first seems to me disorganized or challenging.