Wilhelmina en Wellington c. 1814

Editor: This is "Wilhelmina en Wellington," a porcelain ceramic plate made around 1814 by Adrianus Johannes Bik. It's deceptively simple—just a white plate with gold trim and a small central image. It feels very… formal and commemorative. What historical narratives are embedded in this object? Curator: It's more than just decorative, isn't it? This seemingly simple object speaks volumes about power, alliance, and the performance of patriotism. Think about the context: 1814. Napoleon had just been defeated. What do you imagine the cultural atmosphere would be? Editor: Probably relief, and a desire for stability. This plate seems to celebrate…Wilhelmina and Wellington, but why put them together on something so everyday? Curator: Precisely. Wilhelmina, Princess of Orange, representing the restored Dutch monarchy, and Wellington, the British Duke, the hero of Waterloo. The placement of their portraits on a *plate*, of all things, indicates a desire to bring these figures, and their symbolic importance, into the domestic sphere. It's a form of cultural propaganda, would you agree? Editor: That’s fascinating. So it’s not just about remembering history, but about shaping public opinion within the home. But is the use of porcelain significant? Curator: Absolutely. Porcelain itself was a luxury item, symbolizing wealth and good taste. Using this expensive medium to create a portrait reinforces the high status of the figures. Ownership of this plate became a silent declaration of political allegiance, doesn’t it? Editor: I see. So it’s like saying, “I support the new order” by displaying this seemingly innocent plate. That’s a powerful statement for a dish. Curator: Indeed. It transforms something ordinary into a potent symbol. We learn about art and history, but it invites us to look closely and consider who art impacts and why. Editor: Thank you, this completely changed my perspective on what I thought was just another plate.