Pair of Wheellock Rifles Made for Emperor Leopold I (1640–1705) by Caspar Neireiter

Pair of Wheellock Rifles Made for Emperor Leopold I (1640–1705) 1645 - 1705

0:00
0:00

metal, sculpture, wood

# 

metal

# 

sculpture

# 

sculpture

# 

wood

# 

history-painting

# 

armor

Dimensions L. of each 43 3/8 in. (110.2 cm); L. of each barrel 32 1/16 in. (81.4 cm); Cal. of each .544 in. (13.8 mm); Wt. of 50.203.1 9 lb. 4 oz. (4196 g); Wt. of 50.203.2 9 lb. 3 oz. (4167 g)

Curator: Alright, next up we have a "Pair of Wheellock Rifles Made for Emperor Leopold I (1640–1705)". Caspar Neireiter was the craftsman, and the materials used are primarily wood and metal. What's grabbing your eye here? Editor: Oh, the craftsmanship is simply exquisite. The silver inlay against the wood creates such a rich visual texture. It's opulent, yes, but with an underlying darkness…a coldness that makes me think about power and… well, death. Curator: Absolutely, death, war, the hunt... weapons are never neutral. It's easy to forget that these aren't just tools. Look at the elaborate carvings - swirling floral patterns intertwined with heraldic crests and imperial symbols. The weaponry here is not simply a practical tool. Editor: The symbols are definitely telling, each an exercise of a specific control over visual memory. Did having all that power displayed on their guns give them more strength, you think? I almost feel bad for any deer staring down that barrel. Or a dissenting noble, perhaps. Curator: Right! The wheellock mechanism itself was a technological marvel for its time. More advanced, far more expensive than matchlock weapons, with complex and impressive aesthetics for our eye here. It's the 17th-century equivalent of, like, a luxury sports car. Editor: More like a dragon, something sleek and deadly, covered in gold. It brings up this contradiction for me. This pairing of the gorgeous with the brutal. Is this some elaborate, Freudian compensation thing? Is he adorning these in flowery details to take the edge off of his mortality? Curator: That's one heck of an interpretation, sure! This feels linked to this whole performance of power - this visual saturation almost obscures the inherent violence with symbols of divine right and aristocratic leisure. Maybe to reassure oneself that this violence is somehow...civilized. Editor: Civilization as an elaborate disguise! What else do we adorn? Our own bodies? Our beliefs? But it makes you think, right? All the symbols, all the decoration… what are we trying to hide – from ourselves and others? What monsters? Curator: Or maybe what beautiful possibilities we keep locked away? Either way, staring down these weapons helps brings it all into sharper focus, wouldn't you agree? Editor: Oh, absolutely. Looking at them like this does cut deep in surprising ways, yeah.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.