The Actors Ichikawa Danjuro V as Hige no Ikyu, Nakamura Riko as Agemaki, and Ichikawa Ebizo as Agemaki's attendant in the play "Sukeroku Yukari no Edozakura" at the Nakamura Theater in the third month, 1784 by Torii Kiyonaga

The Actors Ichikawa Danjuro V as Hige no Ikyu, Nakamura Riko as Agemaki, and Ichikawa Ebizo as Agemaki's attendant in the play "Sukeroku Yukari no Edozakura" at the Nakamura Theater in the third month, 1784 1784

0:00
0:00

print, woodblock-print

# 

portrait

# 

print

# 

asian-art

# 

ukiyo-e

# 

figuration

# 

woodblock-print

# 

genre-painting

Dimensions 35.4 × 24.4 cm (right sheet)

Editor: Here we have "The Actors Ichikawa Danjuro V as Hige no Ikyu, Nakamura Riko as Agemaki, and Ichikawa Ebizo as Agemaki's attendant in the play 'Sukeroku Yukari no Edozakura'," a woodblock print made in 1784 by Torii Kiyonaga. The detail in the figures’ costumes is incredible. What draws your eye to this particular ukiyo-e print? Curator: My attention immediately goes to the means of production and circulation. This wasn’t high art for an elite audience. Woodblock prints democratized access to imagery. Consider the labor involved: the artist, the block carver, the printer. These were skilled craftspeople producing multiples, and that changed how art functioned in society. Editor: So, you see the printmaking process itself as the most significant element? Curator: Absolutely. Look at the registration of the colors. It tells a story of careful labor. And beyond the act of making, think about the social context. These actors, portraying characters from a popular play, became commodities. The print enabled the consumption of celebrity and spectacle, collapsing the boundaries between art and entertainment. Editor: It’s interesting to think about actors as commodities in that era, amplified by printmaking. But wouldn’t the artistry still be paramount? The elegant lines, the composition… Curator: Of course, technique matters. But focusing solely on artistic genius obscures the material conditions that allowed this image to exist and circulate. The availability of paper, pigments, the established networks of distribution – all of these factors shaped what we see. Think of how mass production impacts contemporary consumption. Editor: So, it's not just the ‘what’ but the ‘how’ and ‘why’ that define the piece? It opens a door to broader historical understanding. Curator: Precisely! By looking at process and materiality, we challenge traditional notions of art and recognize the labor, the technology, and the social forces embedded in every image. Editor: This approach highlights aspects I would have overlooked. Thanks for opening my eyes!

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.