Still Life with a Roemer by Jan Davidsz de Heem

Still Life with a Roemer 1652

0:00
0:00

painting, oil-paint, glass, wood

# 

baroque

# 

dutch-golden-age

# 

painting

# 

oil-paint

# 

glass

# 

oil painting

# 

fruit

# 

wood

# 

genre-painting

Dimensions 34.5 cm (height) x 50.5 cm (width) (Netto), 49 cm (height) x 65.1 cm (width) x 5.7 cm (depth) (Brutto)

Curator: Jan Davidsz de Heem's "Still Life with a Roemer," painted in 1652, presents us with an opulent display of food and drink rendered in oil on wood. Editor: My first thought? Decadence! Look at this—fruit practically tumbling out of the frame alongside a large, shiny drinking glass and a dead crab. It speaks to me of luxury and maybe even a little bit of excess. Curator: Excess indeed! It reflects the prosperity of the Dutch Golden Age. The items chosen aren't just randomly placed; they speak volumes about global trade routes. Consider the Roemer glass, a symbol of Dutch craftsmanship, placed alongside citrus fruit likely imported from the Mediterranean. Editor: Precisely. And what about the crab? Its presence feels particularly symbolic, adding another layer. The inclusion of such a seemingly unusual item asks us to contemplate labor, and specifically perhaps even that of fisherman who likely produced that luxury at their expense. It invites us to think of class disparity and the social cost of abundance, a kind of muted Vanitas motif. Curator: Interesting. I am also drawn to the contrasting textures - the smooth glass, the velvety peaches, the rough lemon peel, and even the bumpy shell of the crab, meticulously rendered to capture their material qualities. Note too the considered use of chiaroscuro, throwing light onto the subjects creating visual interest, while also demonstrating his control of materials. Editor: And isn't it fascinating to consider the position of the artist within all this? De Heem was undoubtedly dependent on this emerging capitalist system, his survival determined by the success of these wealthy patrons of Dutch Golden Age society. He’s not just representing wealth, he's benefiting directly from it. Curator: It makes you think about his role as an artist embedded within these trade networks and patronage systems. Were any apprentices exploited, or rare materials traded against human rights in order to create this beautiful image. De Heem uses these tools, with masterful skill. Editor: Right. This single still life touches upon issues of class, colonialism, the environment and labor rights that feel particularly prescient. So much contained in such an intimate scale. Curator: Precisely. The piece offers not just visual delight, but also invites critical questioning. Editor: An exploration, truly, of taste, and its social construction.

Show more

Comments

statensmuseumforkunst's Profile Picture
statensmuseumforkunst over 1 year ago

Food has been a theme in art since ancient times. From classical Greece and Rome, murals and mosaics with fruit and luxury foods have been preserved. In the written sources of ancient renowned painters and their competitions at being the best to imitate nature, one of the most beloved and quoted anecdotes deals precisely with Zeuxis’ painting of fruit. When the Dutch painter Philips Angel (ca. 1618 – after 1664) published a poetic tribute to painting, Lof der schilder-kunst (1642), he began his text with this anecdote. In 1652 the Flemish/Dutch still life painter Jan Davidsz. de Heem (1606-83/84) signed and dated his painting Still Life with a Roemer. The table is covered for a snack with plum, apricot, peach, grapes, some seafood and the indispensable lemon. The painter may have been sending a greeting to Zeuxis with the grape, which appears as a reflection in the yellow bright light on the glass of white wine. While the roemer wine goblet’s impasto painted light reflections are yellowish, the reflections of the pewter plate are completely white. On the edge of the plate a reflection of the cross-window makes a faintly noticeable pattern, yet very clear. The entire composition is in balance, the foreshortenings are perfectly executed and the harmony of the colors unsurpassed. Perhaps it was the artist's ambition to paint what cannot be painted: the atmosphere in the room and the light as the natural phenomenon; the lightning sparkle of the light reflexes, the light as flickering backlight and the light as a diagonal beam of illuminated dust particles. Angel advocates a way of handling the brush, which should incarnate the essence of nature in its lightness and imitate the atmosphere of nature through its inherent space-creative effect. Angel talks of a ‘sweet-flowing brush’, which evokes a ‘sweet receding’ because without it, one cannot practice any one of the listed technical skills in the toolbox of painting. With his painting, de Heem may have wanted to demonstrate his skills as a painter capable of imitating the depths of nature, what at the time was called ‘houding’.

Join the conversation

Join millions of artists and users on Artera today and experience the ultimate creative platform.