Is fotografie kunst? by Laurens Hansma

Is fotografie kunst? c. 1905 - 1906

0:00
0:00

print, paper, photography

# 

aged paper

# 

toned paper

# 

homemade paper

# 

pictorialism

# 

paperlike

# 

print

# 

paper texture

# 

paper

# 

photography

# 

hand-drawn typeface

# 

folded paper

# 

thick font

# 

golden font

# 

letter paper

Dimensions: height 265 mm, width 360 mm, thickness 10 mm

Copyright: Rijks Museum: Open Domain

Laurens Hansma made this intriguing artwork, whose title asks, "Is photography art?", without a specific date. Looking at this piece, it’s not about bold strokes, but something much more subtle. The palette is muted, almost ghostly, whispering rather than shouting. What interests me is this intricate floral pattern. It’s almost like a wallpaper, creating a field of tiny details that your eyes can get lost in. It creates a unique kind of texture, not from paint, but from the density of the printed pattern. There’s something quiet and subversive about this work. Its delicate surface belies a deeper question about the nature of art itself. It reminds me a bit of the work of Agnes Martin, in its meditative quality and quiet insistence on the power of the subtle gesture. Ultimately, Hansma’s piece suggests that art doesn’t always need to be loud to be profound.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.