Jeremiah Lee 1769

Editor: This is John Singleton Copley’s portrait of "Jeremiah Lee" from 1769, done in oil paint. I’m immediately struck by how the opulence of his clothing contrasts with the somewhat subdued background. What symbols stand out to you in this piece? Curator: Beyond the obvious symbols of wealth and status – the elaborate clothing, the fine rug, the imported table – I see a deeper narrative playing out. The slightly stormy sky hints at a world in turmoil, perhaps mirroring the brewing unrest that would lead to the American Revolution. Notice how Lee firmly plants his foot. Does it suggest his defiance and resilience? Editor: That's interesting! I hadn't considered the weather as symbolic. So the opulence isn’t just about showing off; it’s part of a larger commentary? Curator: Exactly. Look at the placement of the table, laden with writing implements. It signifies Lee's engagement in civic and economic affairs, the very activities that placed him at odds with British policies. The letter in his hand adds another layer. A missive received? Or perhaps a carefully considered response about to be dispatched? Editor: So everything, even the details, seems intentional. I was focusing on the clothes! Curator: The clothes are certainly *part* of it! Baroque portraiture is always filled with allegories for the sitter's role in society, but remember that symbols speak differently through time and culture. What meaning could his clothing convey about the individual? It is likely to impart something about his relationship to civic matters, and it also speaks about societal standing. Editor: I never thought about how a portrait could be a form of historical record with its own visual language. I'll definitely pay more attention to these details from now on. Curator: And I will continue to try to keep this in mind when I look at similar artworks in galleries. It’s important to remember the ever-shifting language of symbolism to consider each piece on its own terms!