Untitled (number drawing) 1988

Editor: So, this is Craig Kauffman’s "Untitled (number drawing)" from 1988, and it’s made with acrylic paint. I find it really chaotic, almost like a visual representation of buzzing energy. What stands out to you? Curator: I see a concentrated engagement with materials and process. Consider the industrial implications of acrylic paint in 1988. What was it replacing? What kind of labor was involved in its production compared to, say, traditional oil paints? This changes our perspective on what exactly Kauffman is communicating here. Editor: That’s interesting. I hadn't considered the materiality itself as a commentary. So, you are saying the use of acrylic paint reflects more than artistic choice; but is an statement? Curator: Precisely. Look at how he layers the colors. Red, yellow, black. Are these the readily available pigments? And how is that affecting the production process? What relationship is he exploring through this materiality between "high art" and something mass-produced or easily bought? The scale suggests a different intention than, say, a smaller, more "precious" work might. Editor: So, instead of focusing solely on the symbolic meaning of the numbers, we should be considering the socio-economic context of his materials and their accessibility? Curator: Exactly! The materials and process become the primary vehicle for understanding Kauffman's statement. By decentering traditional notions of artistic skill, Kauffman puts more power to the art-making conditions and making it relatable to consumers. Editor: This has completely shifted my view. I came in thinking about expression and now I’m thinking about industrialization and artistic labor. Thanks so much! Curator: Absolutely! Always look at the means of production!