Schutterij van Leiden 1689

Curator: Look at this striking print dating from 1689: “Schutterij van Leiden.” It’s attributed to Jan (I) Smeltzing. Editor: My initial impression is the piece has an incredible density, and perhaps more important, this feels less like art and more like currency. How would you contextualize that, though? Curator: I see your point; it operates visually in a currency style while embodying potent political messages for its time. Note, for instance, the imposing Dutch Lion bearing a sword, a potent symbol of power and vigilance during a period of shifting alliances. “Pro Patria”, the inscription indicates this object links notions of war and patriotism with mercantile activity. Editor: Examining the work as a material object gives one a clear understanding about power and politics. What could otherwise be considered a practical instrument, metal stamped in mass, the object represents much of the history during the era. Curator: Precisely! Also note that it bears both symbolic representations of Leiden alongside an armed figure. The symbolism here reflects the interwoven layers of Leiden’s socio-political fabric—a constant struggle to safeguard itself and its burgeoning industries. These details would likely act as reminders for an emergent bourgeoise interested in political power. Editor: How do we interpret those decisions related to form, of this seemingly utilitarian medium? Curator: By connecting form and functionality. Here, the coin becomes more than just currency. It becomes a medium for expressing civic identity and perhaps a shared experience. By analyzing these elements, we can reveal much broader stories about the society and beliefs of this era. Editor: This piece leaves me reflecting on what monetary instruments and emblems are in use today and to what degree these objects continue to reinforce the ideas that these earlier ones held. Curator: Yes, and that intersection between visual culture, currency, and patriotism. A poignant echo across centuries.