Degen in schede en etui behorende bij het ambtskostuum van Dr. A.H.J. Lovink c. 1850 - 1950

Editor: Here we have a ceremonial sword in its sheath, dating from somewhere around 1850 to 1950. It's attributed to Fa. Frans Pauwels, and seems to be a mixed-media piece with metal and wood components. It’s…surprisingly delicate looking for a sword, almost like a fancy letter opener. What symbolic weight do you see here? Curator: Consider the sword – and its presentation – as a powerful assertion of identity. Note the pearlescent handle, the ornate gold detailing on the hilt and sheath; even the wood of the scabbard speaks of a deliberate choice. The combination of lethal weapon and exquisite design invites questions. What stories might this sword tell us about the perceived role, aspirations, or perhaps even the anxieties of Dr. Lovink, the individual it belonged to? Editor: Anxieties? I would have thought that a sword just screamed confidence. Curator: A sword, especially a decorative one such as this, represents power and authority but also responsibility and burden. A blade represents an explicit power dynamic but in combination with the scabbard and etui we may ask to what degree the owner acknowledges or disavows this social contract? The craftsmanship emphasizes refinement, yet cannot entirely disguise its inherent purpose. Do you agree it’s like a constant negotiation, wouldn't you say? Editor: I see what you mean. The craftsmanship does seem to be emphasizing a certain civility, almost as if to say, "I have power, but I’m also a refined individual." It makes me wonder how often it was actually worn and what message he wanted to communicate. Curator: Exactly. Its value lies not in combat, but in conveying an image, performing a role. This weapon isn't simply an object, but a symbol pregnant with meaning for both the owner and their beholders. Editor: Thanks! Now I see this object more as a performance of power. It’s fascinating how much an object can reveal about someone’s identity.