Bag still bank c. 1970

Editor: This stoneware piece, William Brown’s “Bag still bank” from around 1970, has this strangely organic form. I see an earthy, mottled glaze contrasting with intentional, almost crude, carvings. How do you interpret the function and aesthetic of this object? Curator: It's fascinating how this work operates within the context of the studio pottery movement of that time. Often, we see a drive toward functional objects elevated to art status. Considering the "bank" aspect, I wonder, what's being saved here? Is it merely coinage, or is Brown making a statement about consumerism, savings as an aesthetic practice, or a social commentary about material value in the 1970's? Editor: I see what you mean about savings beyond coinage. The raw, almost primal form could represent something foundational. Maybe it speaks to basic survival or even the grit to make art during times of socio-economic uncertainty. Curator: Precisely! The aesthetic here isn't just about form and function; it reflects a wider societal tension. How does the artist engage with institutions? For example, is this being displayed inside a white cube? A financial institute? Thinking about its placement encourages us to explore that deeper understanding. It pushes the boundaries of what an art object can represent, not just aesthetically, but also ideologically, especially when placed within the museum context. Editor: So, it’s not just an appealing ceramic—it makes us think about broader economic and societal values. It gives "still life" a double meaning. I didn't appreciate it on this level before. Thank you. Curator: My pleasure. Considering how art participates in public dialogues definitely shifts how we understand both the object and ourselves in relation to it.