Portretbuste onthuld door twee apen 1787

Editor: This is "Portretbuste onthuld door twee apen" created in 1787 by Reinier Vinkeles. It looks like an engraving. It has a rather satirical tone, showing monkeys unveiling a bust, with other animals and a strange man gathered around. What can you tell me about this piece? Curator: From a materialist perspective, the engraving technique itself is crucial. Think about the labor involved in creating the printing plate, the accessibility of the image due to printmaking, and how that contrasts with the traditional elitism of portraiture. This piece is commenting on the materials and social structure of art. The artist wasn’t just depicting, he was producing, distributing, making it available to be consumed more democratically than a unique painting or sculpture could. Editor: So, you’re saying the medium is the message, almost? The availability of the engraving changes its meaning? Curator: Precisely! Consider who had access to printed images at this time, who controlled the means of production. How does the choice of engraving affect the accessibility and therefore the reception of the work’s satirical elements? Also, notice how animals—a bull, a lion—appear next to common pets. What commentary is implied, if any, regarding their different contributions? Editor: I never thought about the implications of engraving versus painting for viewership at the time. And the odd juxtaposition of domesticated animals and, say, a bull, hints at class, doesn't it? Thank you! Curator: Of course. Reflecting on the physical process and distribution sheds new light on its meaning. The materials tell their own story, as do the means of producing them and their audience!