Portret van Arnoldus Bloemers by Coenraad Hamburger

Portret van Arnoldus Bloemers 1841

0:00
0:00

drawing, pencil

# 

portrait

# 

pencil drawn

# 

drawing

# 

pencil drawing

# 

romanticism

# 

pencil

# 

realism

Dimensions height 127 mm, width 103 mm

Curator: Immediately, I'm drawn to the sitter's piercing gaze and the precision of line, giving him a powerful sense of presence. Editor: The first thing that strikes me is how delicately this has been executed. Look at the texture achieved with just pencil strokes – it’s really masterful manipulation of a simple medium. Curator: Precisely. This is a portrait of Arnoldus Bloemers by Coenraad Hamburger, made in 1841. Its pencil drawing has a photorealistic intensity, capturing, I feel, the Romanticism prevalent at the time, whilst edging toward Realism, making one really feel as though they were in the same room as Mr. Bloemers. Editor: I'm interested in what that says about labor and how social context. Producing images of public figures through reproductive drawings in a material like graphite became so important for visual knowledge, and for maintaining visual and cultural memory, I mean who else would afford an oil painting? What does it mean when these methods became automated through photography later on? Curator: That's a fascinating way to put it. Thinking about cultural memory, in some respects pencil, despite being more 'humble' retains that human touch, a more emotional record because it requires an intimate connection. It is a symbol of care. Editor: Yes, but that's the problem with Romanticism: it centers these supposedly unique things. I can look past the ideology if I return to process, because really what are these tiny strokes? They are repetitions; they accumulate to describe what you'd see. Even something done with human care isn't that different from automation in this specific portrait format. Curator: True, but looking at those minute hatch marks, especially around the face, you see the weight that human hand applies; there is intention, consideration for his physical form. His character is embedded within the graphite through this meticulous production of image. Editor: It's definitely food for thought in this context. It certainly prompts a reconsideration of artistic work – who produces what and how? Curator: Indeed. Seeing how Hamburger portrays Bloemers provides much to contemplate about not just that period, but now as we try to capture each other's likeness, and what really gives it its symbolic strength.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.