Man met tol c. 1822 - 1827

Editor: So, we have here Gijsbert Barbiers' "Man met tol," made around 1822 to 1827, a silver and metal sculpture depicting a man with a toll or tax collection device. It’s incredibly detailed for such a small object. What strikes you most about this miniature? Curator: I’m fascinated by the very act of creating this object. Silver wasn’t easily accessible, indicating wealth commissioned this, thus controlling the means of production. It prompts the question, what societal value did representing labor on a miniature scale provide to the commissioner? Editor: That’s an interesting angle. I hadn't considered the socioeconomic aspect. Curator: Consider also the level of craftsmanship. Was this artist also responsible for procuring the raw materials, refining it, shaping the components, casting, or welding the silver and metal parts? Editor: Right! So, by analyzing the material choices, we reveal the intricate supply chains of labor, refinement and skills involved in its creation. What's the point of creating the miniature in the first place? Curator: I would argue the act of creating art like this served to further highlight social stratification. While the work shows a 'common' man performing labor, that figure is fixed and preserved in precious metal, which implies that the depiction exists outside the realm of material concerns and daily toil of life for a figure to collect tolls or taxes. Editor: That definitely changes my perspective on this piece. I see your point. Focusing on materiality really exposes the connections between wealth, production, and social structures in the 19th century. Thank you for explaining this artwork using a materialist lens. Curator: My pleasure. There is always something to learn when you explore an artwork through the lens of process, material, and the hands of all who helped create the finished product.