Filippo Neri weigert het kardinaalschap 1630 - 1641

Curator: This print by Luca Ciamberlano, dating from 1630 to 1641, depicts Filippo Neri rejecting the cardinalate. It’s held here at the Rijksmuseum. Editor: Immediately, the composition strikes me as one of refusal and quiet strength. The figure on the right, presumably Filippo Neri, seems resolute despite the cardinal's evident authority. Curator: Precisely. Let's consider the historical context. Neri was a prominent figure in the Counter-Reformation, known for his piety and service to the poor in Rome. He founded the Congregation of the Oratory, a community of priests and brothers. Editor: The very act of refusing the cardinal's hat has symbolic resonance. During the Counter-Reformation, the Church sought to reform from within, addressing corruption and reaffirming its doctrines. Neri's refusal can be interpreted as a rejection of worldly power, a choice for genuine spirituality over institutional prestige. What could his choice communicate to a society grappling with theological debates and the implications of religious reform? Curator: Yes, the politics of imagery were critical during this period. Prints like these disseminated ideas and narratives, influencing public perception of religious figures and events. The engraving itself would have played a part in shaping Neri's image as a humble, virtuous individual within that contested historical moment. Note how the accoutrements of the cardinal are placed on a table as if on display or waiting to be worn; the power is present, but he declines to embrace it. Editor: I’m struck by the tension between the two figures. The Cardinal gestures and pleads; meanwhile Neri looks inward with clasped hands. How did gendered roles or even class affect the church dynamic during that time? And in what ways was refusing power in itself a political act that women were, perhaps, denied? Curator: Well, Ciamberlano likely based this on earlier accounts or commissioned narratives that emphasized Neri's humility. It contributes to a specific image construction. Editor: Regardless, its effectiveness as a statement speaks across time. What might an audience take away today when considering integrity and resistance within large power structures? Curator: It makes us consider the various facets of influence and the potential impact of challenging hierarchical establishments even now. Editor: Indeed. Power dynamics have continued to permeate even how we encounter visual arts, from accessibility in galleries to curatorial voice.