filmstill met drie acteurs in oerwoud met vrouwen en voor- werpen in de bomen hangend by Filma

filmstill met drie acteurs in oerwoud met vrouwen en voor- werpen in de bomen hangend 1920 - 1940

0:00
0:00

photomontage, photography

# 

narrative-art

# 

photomontage

# 

photography

# 

genre-painting

Dimensions height 180 mm, width 228 mm, height 210 mm, width 260 mm

Curator: What a curious image! I'm immediately struck by its uncanny, dreamlike quality. There’s a definite clash of elements here – a kind of staged naturalism. Editor: Indeed. What we have here is a photomontage from between 1920 and 1940, attributed to Filma, titled “filmstill met drie acteurs in oerwoud met vrouwen en voorwerpen in de bomen hangend.” Which translates to "film still with three actors in the jungle with women and objects hanging in the trees". A descriptive title! Curator: "Descriptive" is certainly one word for it. Visually, I’m drawn to the juxtaposition of the somewhat ordinary-looking actors and the incredibly artificial, almost surreal jungle setting. Those bizarre, oversized gourds hanging in the trees completely destabilize the scene. What statement could that suggest? Editor: Well, during that period, exotic locales held significant allure in Western cultural imagination, particularly within film. So, on the one hand, it's the common practice of selling the exotic. Yet, by using photomontage so prominently, it actually highlights the constructed, artificial nature of those fantasies. Perhaps a subversive statement about cinematic illusion itself. Curator: Interesting! To look a bit closer at the actors, their stiff, almost detached poses further enhance the feeling of unreality, they're certainly out of place. Note how the light functions to create different depths? They aren’t seamlessly integrated into the landscape – they’re figures imposed upon it. Editor: I think there's an attempt here to evoke a painterly aesthetic, to position photography within the established art historical discourse. By deliberately making it obvious that it is artificial. But it would seem that the real art in the 1920's lay less in verisimilitude, more in its symbolic power. The layering itself contributes to the symbolic depth. Curator: I agree completely, It presents us with not just an image, but a statement about artifice and reality, desire and representation. The collision of visual styles contributes to a complex cultural conversation about illusion and identity, it has offered a compelling study of the relationship between the human subject and exoticized spaces. Editor: From a purely aesthetic perspective, its layered composition creates such tension – a perfect rendering of both cinematic artifice, and the wider social trends. Curator: A worthwhile deconstruction to be sure!

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.