Dimensions: sheet: 16 3/8 x 10 5/8 in. (41.6 x 27 cm) uneven
Copyright: Public Domain
Curator: Here we have an etching and drawing dating back to the 19th century titled "Design for a Crystal Chandelier," now residing at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. It presents an interesting case for exploring how the decorative arts are valued. Editor: Immediately, it gives me a feeling of precarious beauty, you know? Like all that elaborate geometry held together by some delicate thread of intention. A kind of frozen waterfall of light, yearning to spill onto the ballroom floor. Curator: I’m intrigued by the drawing's starkness itself. The lack of color forces us to concentrate on the design elements, really highlighting the means of production involved in creating such a visually complex and functional object. How do these lines translate into materialized wealth? Editor: I guess for me it also invokes something quite private and secretive – like, the sketch anticipates the potential beauty and sparkle; a private fantasy on paper to begin with. It's very elegant. Curator: Exactly. This print enables widespread production. It served the demands of a burgeoning upper-middle class, eager to embrace symbols of luxury and gentility. What we often forget is the labour involved and how class stratifications determined access to these designs. Editor: When you see an etching like this, which at first might just strike one as "decorative", you realise its political subtext: Who commissioned it, how would have it being constructed, the working condition... Did artisans consider themselves, indeed, artists or only hand workers? Curator: Absolutely, and in that respect, objects like chandeliers, traditionally produced by skilled artisans, straddled that line, between high art and craft. And these are boundaries worth questioning through material analysis. Editor: It seems to me like they are always already overlapping... but maybe there are boundaries we still can not perceive properly today, hidden biases we haven't yet found! Curator: A potent point. It really showcases the multi-layered way of analyzing. Thanks for sharing your personal reflection; I hadn't quite looked at it that way before. Editor: You opened my eyes too, especially the bit regarding its commercial use, it brought to me other considerations for sure.
Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.