What's the difference between girls and pocket money? c. 19th century

Editor: This print, "What's the difference between girls and pocket money?" by Paul Gavarni, presents two figures in a landscape. The material rendering gives it a somewhat satirical feel. What's your take on the means by which Gavarni produced this image, and how it relates to its message? Curator: The lithographic process is key. Gavarni's choice allowed for mass production, making social commentary accessible. Consider the labor involved, and how this accessibility democratized art consumption, challenging traditional hierarchies. Does this production method influence how we interpret the artwork’s message about social differences and economic realities? Editor: That’s a great point about accessibility shaping the message. I hadn't considered the lithography itself as a commentary. Thanks! Curator: Precisely. By understanding the process and materials, we gain a deeper insight into the social context and intentions of the artist.