Zacharias Geizkofler c. 17th century

Editor: Here we have a portrait of Zacharias Geizkofler by Dominicus Custos. It’s incredible how detailed the engraving is. What strikes you most about the materiality and the process that went into making this? Curator: I'm drawn to the labor involved in creating such intricate details using engraving tools. Consider the economic and social value placed on such skill, where artisans like Custos were commissioned to produce images that served to legitimize power and status. How does the materiality itself become a statement of Geizkofler's position? Editor: That's a great question! I never thought about how the choice of engraving itself contributes to that statement. Curator: Exactly! The reproducibility of engraving also played a role in disseminating his image and solidifying his legacy beyond a unique painted portrait. Do you think this medium created a sense of accessibility, or did it reinforce social hierarchies? Editor: I see your point. It's a fascinating connection between the material and the message. Thank you.