Bombardement of Reims 27 - 1916

Editor: Here we have Jakob Nussbaum's "Bombardement of Reims," created in 1916 using charcoal on paper. There's an incredible frenetic energy to it, almost chaotic, yet it depicts such a tragic scene. How does this piece resonate within the broader context of art during World War I? Curator: That's a keen observation. The chaotic linework reflects the turmoil of war, certainly, but I think this drawing speaks more specifically to the changing role of art itself. World War I fundamentally challenged the established social order, and with it, artistic conventions. Instead of heroic depictions of war, we see a raw, immediate experience. Expressionism, which Nussbaum employed here, became a vehicle for conveying the psychological impact of the conflict. What do you make of the city's depiction? Editor: It's barely there, a ghostly silhouette in the background. It feels less like a portrait of Reims and more like a portrait of trauma, maybe even a protest. Curator: Precisely! It critiques the glorification of war by revealing its destructive reality. The personal sketchbook quality suggests it wasn’t intended for public display, adding another layer of intimacy and authenticity. What political undertones do you perceive, if any? Editor: Given the time and place, perhaps it's a silent critique of German aggression. But I'm also seeing a more universal anti-war statement. The ruins could be anywhere, anytime. Curator: It is compelling that you interpret the universality of the scene given that, historically, German forces did inflict significant damage on Reims. So its reception may differ culturally, given a local French audience versus other contexts. Ultimately, it offers insight into how war reshaped not just landscapes but also artistic expression. Editor: I didn't fully consider the varying cultural perceptions when considering Nussbaum's work. Thank you, I am glad I have a greater understanding of the impact of war on art.