Guggenheim 162--Inauguration, Washington, D.C. by Robert Frank

Guggenheim 162--Inauguration, Washington, D.C. 1957

0:00
0:00

photography, gelatin-silver-print

# 

portrait

# 

film photography

# 

street-photography

# 

photography

# 

gelatin-silver-print

# 

pop-art

# 

modernism

Dimensions: overall: 25.3 x 20.2 cm (9 15/16 x 7 15/16 in.)

Copyright: National Gallery of Art: CC0 1.0

Curator: Today, we're looking at Robert Frank's "Guggenheim 162--Inauguration, Washington, D.C.," a gelatin silver print from 1957. It's a contact sheet, showcasing a series of images. Editor: My first thought is one of disorientation. So many tiny worlds vying for my attention! It's like looking through someone else’s chaotic memory bank. Curator: Exactly. Frank's work often challenges traditional photographic practices. Contact sheets weren't usually presented as finished pieces. Displaying the raw, unedited frames disrupts notions of the decisive moment so valued by photographers. Editor: There’s something deeply vulnerable about showing all the outtakes. It exposes the photographer’s process, the misses, the experiments, which are often hidden. He is essentially offering a counter-narrative to the slick, packaged image we are used to consuming. It screams honesty to me. Curator: Precisely. Frank aimed to capture a more raw, unvarnished version of America. The repetition of subjects across the frames suggests a search, a struggle to distill a complex reality. Inaugurations are staged events but there are frames of bystanders looking like shadows on the background, so this captures America as a staged reality as well. Editor: I’m drawn to how some of these little scenes mirror each other. There's the repetition of American flags juxtaposed to crowds or people; I wonder if Frank aimed to point towards the concept of shared experience but somehow also isolating, within a patriotic backdrop? Curator: Absolutely, that's key. He presents the inauguration not as a unified celebration, but as a fragmented collection of individual encounters. Editor: Knowing the social and political landscape of 1957 America, this feels quite subversive. I wonder if viewers understood what he aimed at at the time. Curator: Many found it cynical. His work didn't neatly align with dominant narratives of post-war prosperity and optimism. It was critical, highlighting inequality and a sense of unease. Editor: So much revealed in those imperfect squares, so many imperfect people and views depicted by this one sheet! Curator: Indeed. A single sheet that encapsulates both an important era for the nation but also one artist's reflection of an image he seemed eager to unveil.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.