Bit 1935 - 1942

Editor: Here we have William Kieckhofel’s watercolor drawing, "Bit," created sometime between 1935 and 1942. It seems to be a study of a horse bit, depicted in great detail against a plain background. What social context might be relevant to appreciating this object as a piece of art? Curator: It’s interesting how you note the detail. Consider this work being made during the Great Depression as part of the Index of American Design. The WPA Federal Art Project sought to document American material culture. This wasn't just about pretty pictures. It was a conscious effort to value vernacular design, often overlooked in favor of European high art, while also giving employment to artists. The project amplified objects of everyday use by elevating them through artistic study, changing our cultural relationship with these commonplace artifacts. Editor: So, the act of documenting gives it importance? It seems almost like elevating the mundane. Curator: Exactly. Think about the audience too. Who was this art intended for? Not necessarily wealthy collectors. This was public art, aimed at promoting national identity and preserving a sense of shared heritage during a period of economic hardship. Do you see a certain regional character in this type of Americana? Editor: Now that you mention it, there is a certain "western" feel, perhaps. So it becomes both a historical record, and a kind of social commentary? Curator: Precisely. By focusing on items like this horse bit, the project asserted the value and dignity of labor and everyday life. Understanding that historical intention transforms our appreciation. We see not just an object, but a statement. Editor: That’s a powerful point. I’ll definitely remember to consider the socio-political influences at play next time I’m interpreting a piece.