Portret van Karel I, koning van Engeland 1613 - 1656

Editor: Here we have Cornelis Danckerts' engraving of Charles I, King of England, dating between 1613 and 1656. It’s striking how the rigid armor contrasts with the softness of his hair. How do you interpret the visual language used here? Curator: The armor indeed symbolizes power and authority, the outward facing strength, but consider the lace collar. Lace historically indicated high status, and evolved from functional trimming to extravagant displays of wealth, intellect and artistry in fashion. This print also incorporates symbolic frames within frames. What effect does this produce? Editor: It does feel quite intentional. Like different levels of formality and presentation are all important here, but what else is implied with these framed portraits? Curator: Throughout history the use of framed portraits – from painted miniatures to printed engravings such as this, memorialize important leaders or loved ones. Looking at this engraving, ask yourself how an image such as this perpetuated the symbolic power of Charles I? How might his image influenced how his subjects perceived him and how the Crown was perceived overall? Editor: I suppose seeing him like this, immortalized in print, wearing armour, gives him this lasting almost mythical quality. Something tangible to keep his image alive. Curator: Exactly. And beyond a literal likeness, portraiture is ripe with constructed signifiers. It allows those in power to curate and control their visual message to subjects. The power of symbolism even within portraiture becomes ever more clear. Editor: So even this seemingly straightforward engraving holds complex cultural meaning about image, authority and memory. It’s incredible to consider its lasting influence. Curator: Precisely. By examining symbols, we decipher how an image connects us to cultural narratives, history, and psychology, ultimately illuminating what survives, and what meanings transform, through generations.