Reproductie van een prent van een portret van Grover Cleveland, president van de Verenigde Staten by Anonymous

Reproductie van een prent van een portret van Grover Cleveland, president van de Verenigde Staten before 1885

0:00
0:00

print, engraving

# 

print

# 

history-painting

# 

engraving

# 

realism

Dimensions: height 104 mm, width 99 mm

Copyright: Rijks Museum: Open Domain

Curator: Here we have an engraving dating from before 1885, titled "Reproduction of a print of a portrait of Grover Cleveland, president of the United States." It depicts Cleveland in a formal suit and tie. The image is actually printed in a book, surrounded by text. Editor: The portrait feels so… contained. Stark even. Surrounded by that wall of tiny text, the President seems boxed in, a prisoner of the printed word or perhaps the pressures of his office. Curator: Precisely. Consider how engravings like these functioned at the time. Printed images of political figures served to disseminate a certain kind of public image, projecting power and respectability. Think about the newspapers, magazines, books… Editor: And the biases inherent in those forms of representation! It's easy to romanticize "objective" portraiture, but every choice – the pose, the lighting, even the medium – constructs a narrative, a message to reinforce an existing power structure. Who controls the image controls the narrative. Curator: This artwork resonates within a larger discussion on image reproduction and its effect on our socio-political understanding of presidents. It shows us how deeply engrained such visual systems were, even before the advent of photography. Editor: I agree. When you look at how presidents have been presented, you start noticing how their personas have been constructed over time to support a set of assumptions. This portrait is not just about one individual; it embodies all the presidential visual politics and expectations attached to leadership in America. Curator: I will keep an eye on these early attempts in art as representation and propaganda to draw correlations later in the history of American art. I appreciate the points you made here. Thank you! Editor: Absolutely! Examining art in the context of power is always a worthwhile endeavor, and hopefully, it leaves viewers thinking about the politics of imagery.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.