Man in een deuropening in de tempel van Ramses III in Egypte by Félix Bonfils

before 1872

Man in een deuropening in de tempel van Ramses III in Egypte

Félix Bonfils's Profile Picture

Félix Bonfils

1831 - 1885

Location

Rijksmuseum

Listen to curator's interpretation

0:00
0:00

Curatorial notes

Curator: This gelatin-silver print by Félix Bonfils, titled "Man in een deuropening in de tempel van Ramses III in Egypte," dating from before 1872, captures a poignant moment within the ancient temple walls. Editor: Immediately, the monochrome and the textures grab me. You see the rough stone juxtaposed with that soft rendering of a man, almost ghost-like, peering out of the darkness. How striking! Curator: Indeed. Bonfils' meticulous capture of the hieroglyphs and carved reliefs—those cartouches and figural representations—preserves not only a physical space but also the cultural memory embedded within. It evokes centuries of symbolism. Editor: Symbolism rooted in exploitation though. Don’t forget Bonfils was part of a larger machine, bringing back these views for Western consumption. The labor of producing the photographic plates, the transportation, the imposition of a Western gaze… it all plays into the final image we’re seeing here. Curator: Certainly, we cannot divorce it from that colonial context. Still, I am drawn to how Bonfils has used the doorway itself as a visual metaphor. The shadowed figure beckons questions about time, history, and the boundaries between worlds. Editor: For me, it speaks volumes about the consumption of the past, filtered and resold as commodity. Consider the physical print itself – a manufactured object, a piece of paper transformed through chemical processes, packaged, and then sold for profit. Curator: And yet, does the medium diminish or amplify the cultural weight it carries? The symbolism of pharaohs, gods, and scribes, now mediated through light, silver, and a photographer’s perspective. There is almost a palpable echo of ancient voices. Editor: True, it also presents the raw materials for us to re-interpret that visual echo. I mean, think about the darkroom and the processes needed. The labor wasn’t about understanding Ramses; it was about industrial methods and how those translate meaning onto paper and later, a gallery wall. Curator: So the past becomes, in essence, material itself – reworked and represented for new consumption, yes. But also for study, introspection. We gain insight by looking closer, by questioning our perceptions. Editor: Agreed. The image operates as evidence of power structures both past and present. Bonfils captures more than just a temple, he’s documented a moment of encounter, and in his turn, we encounter that too. A palimpsest of intentions.