Powder Horn c. 1936

Editor: This is John Tarantino’s "Powder Horn," a drawing from around 1936. The object itself has such a smooth, flowing shape. What associations come to mind when you see this drawing? Curator: It immediately brings to mind questions around the concept of utility, especially in a historical context dominated by men and their access to resources like gunpowder. How was this powder horn adorned, used, carried? These were potent symbols, reflecting one’s status and connection to violent conflict, yet are often presented as simple craft. How can we disrupt that? Editor: That's interesting. I hadn’t thought about it in terms of its original function and symbolism, just appreciating it as a purely aesthetic object. Curator: Precisely. We often view these objects outside of their power dynamics. Who were permitted access? Who benefitted, and who suffered because of what this tool enabled? The craftsmanship itself could be interpreted through a gendered lens too. Editor: How so? Curator: Much like quilting and needlepoint were considered “women's work,” similar intricate crafting of items for male usage were either overlooked or celebrated under a patriarchal framework. Were these crafted by men? Are such skills less valuable simply because of gender? The drawing normalizes the aesthetic as masculine without such reflection. Editor: I see what you mean. So, looking at it now, it is no longer just a pleasing shape, but it makes you question who held the power to commission it, who was involved in its creation and use, and what social narratives are obscured through this presentation. Curator: Exactly! Objects such as these exist within intricate social fabrics. It requires a critical awareness that brings attention to the social imbalances present at the time of the object’s creation. It enables us to see the horn as more than mere utility. Editor: I hadn't thought of analyzing everyday items this way, so it's changed how I will approach these older art pieces in the future!