Carte photographique de la lune, planche IX.A (Photographic Chart of the Moon, plate IX.A) by Charles Le Morvan

Carte photographique de la lune, planche IX.A (Photographic Chart of the Moon, plate IX.A) Possibly 1902 - 1914

0:00
0:00

print, photography

# 

print

# 

landscape

# 

photography

Dimensions image: 31.1 × 25.5 cm (12 1/4 × 10 1/16 in.) plate: 38.9 × 29.5 cm (15 5/16 × 11 5/8 in.) sheet: 49 × 37.9 cm (19 5/16 × 14 15/16 in.)

Editor: This is *Carte photographique de la lune, planche IX.A*, or Photographic Chart of the Moon, Plate IX.A, by Charles Le Morvan, made sometime between 1902 and 1914. It’s a photograph of the lunar surface. The craters and varying shades of grey are striking; there's an alien starkness that feels both isolating and inspiring. How do you interpret this work in a broader sense? Curator: This image makes me think about power dynamics, especially in the context of scientific exploration and representation. The act of mapping the moon, reducing it to a "photographic chart," can be seen as an act of claiming and controlling knowledge. Who gets to look, who gets to interpret, and who is left out of the frame? Editor: That’s an interesting way to look at it. I hadn’t considered the aspect of control. It seemed so objective at first glance. Curator: Exactly! But objectivity is itself a position. Think about the colonial era, when European powers were mapping and charting territories across the globe. Photography played a crucial role in constructing and reinforcing their dominance, “scientifically” justifying their exploitation. Does this image, in its own way, participate in that history of objectification? Editor: I see what you mean. The cool, detached observation mimics that authoritative gaze. But what about the beauty of the image? Can’t it be appreciated aesthetically, too? Curator: Of course, aesthetic appreciation is valid. But can we separate it from the historical context that produced it? Recognizing the power dynamics at play doesn't negate the beauty; it enriches our understanding, forcing us to consider whose perspective is privileged in that appreciation. Editor: I hadn’t considered the photograph’s ties to colonialism and historical exploitation, that certainly reframes the work, adding a new layer to it. Curator: And hopefully sparks critical questions! Editor: Absolutely. I’ll definitely be thinking about whose gaze is being prioritized moving forward.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.