Boys at a fountain 1745 - 1760

Editor: So, here we have "Boys at a Fountain" made around 1745-1760 by the Saint James's Factory. It’s porcelain, a delicate ceramic. There's a sort of whimsical sweetness to it. It makes me think of garden parties. What's your take? Curator: Garden parties, yes! It's Rococo, dripping in playful elegance. See the plump cherubic figures, the delicate floral designs? The piece breathes privilege. It almost feels like a crystallized daydream from a silk-upholstered drawing room, don’t you think? The bird perched atop feels like the carefree spirit of the aristocracy. Editor: Absolutely! The bird is charming, perched up there like it owns the place. Is there anything else that speaks to you particularly about this object? Curator: For me, it's the subtle eroticism, that barely-there, sugar-coated indulgence. Note how the soft curves contrast against the fountain's architectural lines. Does that not strike you as hinting at secret pleasure? Or is it just me projecting? Editor: Hmm, I hadn't thought of that! The smoothness of the porcelain itself is quite sensual. But is this all surface and symbolism of an elite class? Curator: Well, perhaps that *is* the point: beauty as a statement of power. Rococo unapologetically luxuriated in its own beauty, even if it was a gilded cage for the common person. Is it problematic? Of course. Is it exquisitely crafted? Undeniably. Editor: Food for thought. I suppose I appreciate the craftsmanship more, now, seeing beyond just sweetness. Curator: Exactly! These aren't just figurines; they are miniature records of a mindset, aren't they? What starts off looking frivolous then gains such depth!