Dress by Anonymous

Dress 1935 - 1942

0:00
0:00

drawing, watercolor

# 

portrait

# 

drawing

# 

figuration

# 

watercolor

# 

history-painting

# 

academic-art

# 

decorative-art

Dimensions overall: 29.1 x 22.9 cm (11 7/16 x 9 in.)

Editor: Here we have an anonymous drawing titled "Dress," made with watercolor between 1935 and 1942. It strikes me as a ghost of fashion, a beautifully rendered object without a body to fill it. What historical contexts help illuminate this delicate image? Curator: Well, it’s fascinating how this watercolor drawing, so evocative of 18th-century fashion, was actually created in the mid-20th century. Consider the 1930s and 40s—a period marked by both economic depression and impending war. Editor: Right. Curator: During these decades, there was a nostalgia in visual culture for pre-industrial aesthetics and this drawing could reflect that, but it would be crucial to see what this dress was supposed to be for. If we analyze who created this dress it will give us clues on the historical context. Was this maybe a drawing that an important company paid an illustrator to create for advertising, catalogs, or pattern-making perhaps? Editor: So you are asking who produced the drawing, as a way to investigate for whom it was intended and therefore understand the broader cultural function of the artwork. Curator: Precisely. Examining the "why" behind its creation – especially during such a turbulent time period – reveals more about its place within the socio-economic and political landscape of its era. Editor: I see how looking at art production can offer insight beyond pure aesthetics, especially since this aesthetic feels almost "stolen" from another time. Curator: Indeed, it also raises the intriguing question of how and why decorative arts – or representations thereof - circulated in this particular time. Think about museums and archives that collected, presented, or failed to showcase artwork such as these. This also would've influenced how people perceived the image. Editor: I hadn't considered it that way, I was very stuck on the image as an artwork, forgetting its function. Curator: It's a fantastic reminder to think about art’s social role and the forces that shape how we see and interpret it. Editor: Definitely given me a lot to think about!

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.