Ida O'Keeffe by Alfred Stieglitz

Ida O'Keeffe 1924

0:00
0:00

photography, gelatin-silver-print

# 

portrait

# 

self-portrait

# 

portrait

# 

photography

# 

gelatin-silver-print

# 

modernism

# 

realism

Dimensions: sheet (trimmed to image): 11.9 × 9.2 cm (4 11/16 × 3 5/8 in.) mount: 34.2 × 27.5 cm (13 7/16 × 10 13/16 in.)

Copyright: National Gallery of Art: CC0 1.0

Curator: The intimacy of this portrait grabs me—it’s like Stieglitz captured a genuine moment of lightness in Ida O’Keeffe, dating to 1924. The gelatin silver print itself lends a classic quality, wouldn't you agree? Editor: Absolutely, the monochrome enhances a sense of timelessness. What strikes me most is the light in her eyes. She's gazing upwards, perhaps towards the sun, imbued with such an unburdened happiness. Do you think this upward gaze, especially in photographic portraits from that time, can tell us something symbolic? Curator: It's quite affecting, isn't it? And considering this was the era when Stieglitz was deeply invested in capturing “equivalents"—finding abstract visual forms to mirror internal states—I wouldn't dismiss it at all. It makes me think of her as not just Georgia O’Keeffe's sister, but a woman reaching toward something, aspirational. Her hair arranged into buns almost like antennae… receiving something… Editor: I love that read. Antennae searching for signals beyond the visible. The circle on her dress reminds me of alchemical symbols, perhaps alluding to completeness or wholeness. Curator: Or is it a kind of reverse badge, saying the same message? It sits so pointedly on the chest, drawing attention to a source. The neutrality of its tone throws it in stark relief from the rest of the photo. I think that we can get really caught up in these portraits only for who people were and what they were to each other in their interpersonal dramas when in the photo there are very different symbolic intentions afoot. Editor: The circle itself represents infinite unity, so in contrast to the stark realism, does this push the photo further towards this modern symbolic experimentation? There's also something intriguing in the balance between revealing and concealing, typical of that time. Curator: Yes, that balance… He highlights a candid spirit and projects a narrative simultaneously. It's the layering, isn't it? And that interplay, which I guess he successfully achieved across all of his photos from that era, leaves so much room for us to still ponder and find relevance, all this time later. Editor: A dance of symbolism and directness… quite captivating when you look at it like that. It leaves you wondering about the depths of what isn't seen, doesn't it?

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.