N.W. Corner of Dearborn and Monroe Streets, Chicago, Showing the Post Office Building in the Year 1865 by Raoul Varin

N.W. Corner of Dearborn and Monroe Streets, Chicago, Showing the Post Office Building in the Year 1865 c. 1927

0:00
0:00

drawing, lithograph, print, paper

# 

drawing

# 

16_19th-century

# 

lithograph

# 

print

# 

paper

# 

historic architecture

# 

site analysis

# 

cityscape

# 

realism

Dimensions: 391 × 542 mm (image); 453 × 487 mm (plate); 539 × 709 mm (sheet)

Copyright: Public Domain

Editor: Here we have Raoul Varin’s “N.W. Corner of Dearborn and Monroe Streets, Chicago, Showing the Post Office Building in the Year 1865,” a lithograph from around 1927. The scene bustles with horse-drawn carriages and figures in period dress, a window into a past Chicago. It really captures a sense of daily life. What do you see when you look at it? Curator: I'm immediately drawn to the labor implied, not just within the image – the coachmen, the figures seemingly engaged in commerce – but also the labor *of* the image itself. Lithography, a relatively accessible printmaking process, allowed for wider dissemination of such views. Consider the materials: paper, ink, the lithographic stone. Editor: Right, it makes you wonder who had access to images like these, and what kind of value they placed on them. Curator: Precisely! Who was consuming this image, and what was their relationship to the burgeoning urban landscape depicted? The mass-producibility via lithography democratizes the image to some extent, but it simultaneously positions it as a commodity. It feeds a particular hunger for seeing and owning a piece of the city. Look at the minute details in the architectural renderings; consider the sheer effort put into such a meticulous record. How does that change our perception? Editor: That's fascinating; the idea of the image as a commodity itself. I never really considered that, but now I’m seeing how the print medium really opens that idea up. Curator: Exactly. And notice, too, that it's rendered after the fact, from 1927. We must consider how distance and consumption mix into nostalgia and change our experience of this scene. Editor: So, it’s less about a specific historical moment and more about the ongoing process of representing and re-representing history through material means. Curator: Exactly! It really reveals the complex interplay between art, labor, and societal values in both the 19th and early 20th centuries. Editor: I’ll definitely remember to consider the means of production when I look at art now. Curator: An essential practice in art appreciation.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.