Tawny Owl 1789

Editor: So, this is William Lewin's "Tawny Owl," a watercolor drawing from 1789. The owl's eyes are so big and dark; it's quite captivating, almost pleading. What strikes you most about this image? Curator: I am immediately drawn to the power dynamics inherent in the gaze. The owl, presented almost as a portrait subject, embodies a kind of pre-Romantic sensibility regarding the natural world. Given the socio-political context of 1789 – the French Revolution brewing, shifting power structures – I can't help but consider this piece as a subtle commentary on the vulnerability of certain populations within society, made all the more striking since owls often feature in positions of power or authority in broader popular culture. What do you make of the choice to use watercolor? Editor: Watercolor feels gentle, almost delicate. Does that contribute to your interpretation of vulnerability? Curator: Absolutely. Watercolour, often associated with amateur or feminine artistry at that time, softens what could be a more commanding or fearsome image of the owl, underlining its vulnerability within a human-dominated world. Consider also the naturalism of the rendering. It’s not just a painting of an owl; it’s an attempt to document and categorize nature, echoing broader Enlightenment efforts to control and codify the natural world. How might Lewin’s depiction of this Tawny Owl disrupt or reinforce existing narratives? Editor: I see your point! The naturalism could also serve as a form of resistance, highlighting the beauty and intrinsic worth of an often misunderstood creature. Curator: Precisely. It complicates the narrative. The artist highlights its vulnerability and innate value. It subtly challenges viewers to consider their relationship with the natural world and the consequences of dominating it. Editor: This makes me think about current ecological issues. Thanks. It gives a totally new perspective. Curator: Indeed, looking back to nature inspires actions to come.