Purse c. 1936

Editor: This is "Purse," a colored-pencil drawing on paper from around 1936 by Edith Magnette. I’m immediately struck by the detail and precision, making these everyday objects feel quite precious. How does its history shape our interpretation of these images? Curator: Precisely. This drawing exists not merely as a representation of a functional item, but as a reflection of socio-economic status, historical context, and feminine artistic expression in a specific historical moment. We see decorative arts taking shape in this era. Editor: How so? Curator: Think about the role of the purse in the 1930s. Beyond its function, the purse was also a key part of a woman's appearance and identity, a symbol of self-presentation. The detailed depiction here elevate that significance, almost immortalizing it. This drawing isn’t just documentation; it's about aspiration and idealized presentation. What do you make of the choice to represent not one but *two* purses? Editor: Hmm, maybe showcasing different styles or occasions, suggesting a variety in a woman's life? Or even documenting examples of popular design at the time? I'm also curious about its status as decorative art; would this drawing be used for pattern-making? Curator: That’s insightful. The connection to pattern-making is worth pursuing further. Decorative arts were evolving through art schools at the time. Was the intent function, fine art, or instruction? By examining the societal context, we unveil how everyday items become loaded symbols within artistic expression. Editor: I see now, the act of sketching shifts the purpose and the viewing, giving cultural relevance to design. Thank you!