Diversion by John Paul Jones

Diversion 1951

0:00
0:00

print, etching

# 

abstract-expressionism

# 

print

# 

etching

# 

geometric

# 

abstraction

Dimensions plate: 505 x 604 mm sheet: 547 x 645 mm

Curator: So, here we have John Paul Jones’s etching from 1951, titled "Diversion." The printmaking process is central to understanding it, especially his mastery of the etching technique. Editor: Ah, my first impression is that it is… restlessly elegant. All these geometric forms – triangles, rectangles, curves—confined within a rigid frame, striving, perhaps awkwardly, for freedom. Curator: The choice of etching as a medium is significant; consider the labor. The lines, seemingly free-flowing, required careful planning and the application of acid to a metal plate. This deliberate, time-consuming process contradicts the appearance of spontaneity. What about its social context? Editor: I see a society rebuilding, attempting structure amidst lingering shadows. And in me, something tugs...a nostalgic echo of mid-century modern design! I wonder about the title; perhaps "diversion" hints at escaping harsh realities into pure form? Or escaping artistic tradition with an unrefined style? Curator: Good point. Its title asks for what distractions and forms of labour divert or distract? In mid-century America, printmaking was democratizing art. Consider the accessibility of prints compared to unique paintings; they allowed art to enter more homes, reshaping aesthetic consumption. Editor: That’s right! So the artist offers a controlled explosion onto a typically austere, cold medium. Despite the geometry, there's something undeniably human here. It doesn't feel cold or machine-made. Is that an intentional resistance against mechanical perfection, then? Curator: Precisely. Also the visible marks of the making process; the imperfections and variations in tone and texture all point to the human hand and a more accessible art for the masses during times of shifting labor dynamics. Editor: Thinking about this some more, the geometric components feel like fragments pieced together from memory… or a disassembled machine attempting, clumsily but persistently, to reconstruct itself. Curator: Well, now my thinking of this is redirected by you! I appreciate the shift. Editor: Absolutely, looking and reflecting critically opens up new opportunities for us all to learn.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.