Erotic Scenes c. mid to late 18th century

Editor: Right, next up we have "Erotic Scenes," an ink drawing by Tsukioka Settei, dating back to the mid-to-late 18th century. There's a delicate intimacy to it, almost secretive, given the private act being depicted. What’s your interpretation of the role such an image might have played in its time? Curator: Well, let's think about the broader cultural landscape. In 18th century Japan, *shunga*, or erotic art like this, wasn't necessarily relegated to the margins. Often, they circulated among the literate classes, even used as…marital aids, shall we say? But beyond titillation, what else do you see? Consider how this piece might participate in a broader dialogue about societal norms and expectations. Editor: It’s fascinating to think of erotic art as both a private indulgence and potentially a form of social commentary, especially as part of the Ukiyo-e movement! So, would it be fair to say it was pushing some kind of boundary? Curator: Precisely. Consider the artist's own social standing and who their likely patrons were. How might Settei, by producing such work, be commenting on class, gender roles, or even the very concept of public vs. private life in Edo society? Do you notice the emphasis on line and composition in a context seemingly unconcerned with more high-minded subjects? Editor: I suppose, considering it's in the Minneapolis Institute of Art now, the meaning's definitely shifted across time and context. I guess it does kind of make me think of how gender is viewed now, and how it was viewed in the past. How it was viewed through media. Curator: Yes, exactly. How does the very act of displaying this piece in a museum transform its meaning? What conversations does it spark about censorship, artistic freedom, or the public’s right to view art of this nature? Food for thought! Editor: It certainly is! I'll definitely think about it from the museum's point of view from now on, instead of just the artist's intention, thank you!