Necklace Strung with Shell and Ceramic Beads c. 10th/16th century

Editor: This is a Chancay necklace made with shell and ceramic beads around the 10th to 16th century. I'm really struck by the contrast between the roughness of the materials and the overall delicate feel. What’s the story behind these materials and their arrangement? Curator: Well, a necklace isn't just decorative; it embodies social and political messages, status, and beliefs of its culture. Consider the accessibility of materials – shell and ceramic. Were these materials commonly available to all members of Chancay society, or did their access dictate hierarchy? The colours and placement, even now, can be quite indicative of identity, affiliations, and even trade networks if certain materials originate elsewhere. Editor: So, the material tells a story? Curator: Exactly. Think about who wore it and when. Was it part of burial rites? Used in ceremonial events? Everyday wear? A necklace could demarcate a leader, celebrate agricultural events, and so much more. How does understanding the societal function impact our modern understanding of the artwork? Editor: It’s almost like deciphering a language through the objects left behind. Are the patterns and colours specific to certain social groups, maybe telling us something about alliances or rivalries? Curator: Precisely! Patterns are not always decorative; they're culturally codified languages. By focusing on patterns and the social life of objects, we can trace these social connections. Editor: I guess it goes beyond simple aesthetics. Thanks, that’s really helpful! Curator: Glad I could help you see beyond the surface and discover historical narratives.