The Three Graces 

Art Historian: Editor: So, this is "The Three Graces," and I think it is a painting made by Michael Parkes. It looks like it’s created with tempera, and, honestly, it gives me a bit of a classical, Renaissance vibe, in how it resembles a mural. How would you interpret this work? Art Historian: Well, let’s look closely at its materiality and process. The figures, while referencing classical ideals of beauty and possibly neo-classical inspiration, are produced through modern industrial means. Think about it—what does the use of tempera today imply about the artist’s intentions versus its use in the Renaissance? Does it critique or celebrate commodity culture through subject and process? Editor: Hmm, interesting. So, instead of focusing on the symbolic meaning of the graces themselves, you're drawn to the statement the artist is making by choosing these specific materials? Like, it changes how we read a classical theme in a modern consumerist context? Art Historian: Exactly! It's about labor and consumption. The smooth finish achieved with tempera can be seen as both celebrating traditional craft while also speaking to modern production. What kind of dialogue is created in its realism? Also consider the role that social power played at the time, perhaps these depictions offer a revisionist narrative of beauty or, they can simply follow already known beauty standards. Editor: I guess I hadn't thought about the painting materials themselves holding so much meaning and influencing my perceptions of it! I was too focused on the symbolism of the Graces and classical painting style. Art Historian: Seeing art through its materials opens up different layers of understanding and social context that are so often overlooked. Thinking about what work and which resources were necessary can reshape any interpretation. Editor: Thanks! That really shifted my understanding; I will definitely be looking at materials differently from now on!