Bouwput aan de Van Diemenstraat te Amsterdam 1897
drawing, pencil
drawing
quirky sketch
impressionism
pen sketch
sketch book
incomplete sketchy
landscape
personal sketchbook
sketchwork
sketch
pen-ink sketch
pencil
sketchbook drawing
storyboard and sketchbook work
sketchbook art
Curator: Welcome. We're looking at George Hendrik Breitner's "Bouwput aan de Van Diemenstraat te Amsterdam" from 1897, currently held in the Rijksmuseum. Editor: It’s a hasty sketch! Almost gestural. I can almost feel the speed of the artist's hand, dashing to capture this… scene. What is it exactly? Controlled chaos maybe? Curator: Precisely! Observe the application of line. There is no traditional perspectival space rendered, rather, layered linear configurations. Note how, in the upper register, several sailing ships reside near what might be, below, a flattened building site with a figure rendered prostrate in the foreground. Editor: That figure...almost engulfed by the excavation. This piece speaks to the working classes who were so fundamentally transforming the Dutch landscape at this time. I am interested in labor exploitation; consider what this era entailed for workers who would have been tasked with executing such massive projects. What were the artist's ethical obligations in representing it? Curator: While context certainly enriches our viewing experience, to only approach a work in such a manner flattens the rich intrinsic formal language. How might the high contrast sketch be seen to communicate affect in and of itself? Its composition does not point the viewer in a direct, stable direction; thus mirroring the unstable nature of constant growth, perhaps. Editor: True! It's definitely a study in contrasts--the rigid vertical masts versus the implied downward trajectory of the worker, the detailed rendering of the ships on the horizon against the bare excavation in the foreground. All highlighting how one class profits and the other is forgotten. Curator: We can't be sure that was Breitner's goal in creation, can we? What cannot be argued, I think, is the composition's engagement in non-hierarchical dissemination. Every corner of the drawing calls the eye. Editor: Indeed. Despite its fleeting nature, the artwork holds the gaze, compels reflection. Curator: Breitner’s study shows us just how much can be extracted from the humblest of mediums, like graphite on paper, through both the eye of the hand and mind. Editor: A quick reminder of labor as the cornerstone of progress, progress built and extracted. Thank you.
Comments
No comments
Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.