. . . if the Art is noble, the critique is saintly . . . c. 19th century

Editor: This is a lithograph by Paul Gavarni, titled ". . . if the Art is noble, the critique is saintly . . .". I find it humorous and a little cynical. What's your take on this scene? Curator: Ah, Gavarni! A keen observer of Parisian life. I see a commentary on the relationship between artist and critic, a timeless dance of creation and judgment. Does the critic truly elevate art or merely stand in its shadow, scribbling pronouncements? Editor: It does make you wonder! So, is Gavarni poking fun at the critics here? Curator: Perhaps. Or perhaps he's acknowledging their power, their ability to shape perception. After all, isn't it the critic who ultimately decides what's "noble"? It's a thought-provoking question, isn’t it? Editor: Definitely gives me a new appreciation for the push and pull in the art world. Thanks!