Unknown Woman 1890
acrylic
rough brush stroke
charcoal drawing
possibly oil pastel
portrait reference
neo expressionist
acrylic on canvas
underpainting
pastel chalk drawing
charcoal
Curator: Here we have Thomas Wilmer Dewing’s “Unknown Woman,” created around 1890. The materials suggest a combination of charcoal and pastel on paper. Editor: It’s hauntingly beautiful. She appears almost spectral, fading into the background. Is that intentional, do you think? Curator: Very likely. Dewing often explored ethereal representations of women. He worked through the late 19th-century Aesthetic movement. Its advocates embraced beauty over any deeper moral or narrative content. The loose application of pastel here definitely evokes a dreamlike, melancholic feeling. Editor: That feeling is amplified for me when considering conventional depictions of women during that era. Consider the ideal "Gibson Girl." She was celebrated through fashion, popular magazine imagery, etcetera, while here, Dewing’s woman is anonymous, dematerialized, as if she is retreating from public visibility and judgment. Curator: That is insightful! Given that Dewing was experimenting with capturing fleeting impressions, and prioritizing atmosphere, I'm tempted to suggest we also analyze the materials he selected. How the artist’s touch shapes those materials, or even suggests mass or volume. Do you have thoughts about the kind of paper, its surface qualities, or where Dewing acquired those pastels? I wonder about production or acquisition in relation to, say, art world structures. Editor: I hadn't really thought about those more practical elements as connected to symbolic qualities. Instead, the limited palette of grays and browns in contrast to her dress... well, the symbolic connection is a Victorian trope representing mourning. Perhaps that’s why I find her so compelling. Her ambiguous status. The feeling the artist is communicating in its own context, even without an actual, documented figure. Curator: Perhaps Dewing’s aestheticism challenges notions of visibility even further when considered against prevailing Victorian conventions? The work does invite lingering questions, not easy certainties. Editor: It truly does. I now appreciate the art both in terms of visual vocabulary and technique. Thank you!
Comments
No comments
Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.