Zeeslag bij Kaap La Hogue en slag bij Steenkerken 1692

Editor: This object is a silver medal created by Jan (I) Smeltzing in 1692, titled "Naval Battle at La Hogue and Battle of Steenkerken." One side depicts the naval battle, and the other, a lion and eagle. The details are incredible; it’s like a miniature history book cast in metal. What can you tell me about it? Curator: Let’s focus on the silver itself. Consider the mining, the refining, the labor involved in producing such a precisely detailed relief. The value wasn’t simply aesthetic; the silver has intrinsic worth. Also, it's not *just* an artistic depiction, it is propaganda material; these medals were circulated as part of early capitalist structures to reinforce national identity and political power, weren't they? Editor: Absolutely. So it’s about the material communicating power? How was the meaning reinforced? Curator: Precisely! The very choice of silver is a statement. Consider the division of labor inherent in creating something like this, and what message did they wish to express? Then how might that message shape our own interpretation today? Editor: I hadn’t considered how the choice of material was so tied to wealth and status. Thinking about the Baroque era and the availability of precious metals really gives this artwork so much more context. Curator: Exactly! It is a reminder of how entwined art, materials, and power structures are. Appreciating that link takes us closer to truly understanding this fascinating object. Editor: I see now that looking at the means of production provides another really interesting angle, helping unpack historical context beyond just subject matter! Curator: Indeed, and next time perhaps also ask about what we consume through our looking.